If nothing adjustments, then nothing adjustments—not less than in the case of a Texas GOP infight over whether or not to ban or regulate consumable hemp merchandise containing hint quantities of THC or different intoxicating cannabinoids.
Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and the Texas Senate performed Gov. Greg Abbott for a idiot but once more, because the higher chamber’s lawmakers voted, 22-8, on Aug. 18 to cross laws that disobeys the governor’s proclamation for a second particular session, during which he referred to as on the Legislature to regulate hemp merchandise quite than ban them.
Because the presiding officer of the Senate, Patrick championed comparable laws within the common session that Abbott vetoed in June as a result of he didn’t need to criminalize a “lawful agricultural commodity.” Nonetheless, Patrick and Senate Republicans stay steadfast of their prohibitive method, regardless of the Texas Structure barring state lawmakers from passing laws in a particular session that veers from the governor’s name.
The most recent laws, Senate Invoice 6, mirrors what the Senate handed within the first particular session: to ban the manufacture and sale of merchandise containing hemp-derived compounds aside from nonintoxicating CBD or CBG.
Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, sponsors the laws.
“It’s the identical invoice we handed out within the first particular session; nothing’s modified aside from the truth that increasingly data comes out each week concerning the influence and results of THC on the mind, the physique and long-term use,” Perry stated Monday night earlier than the ground vote on S.B. 6. Perry claimed polls help his place and drives the dialog towards “reliable science” that “these items just isn’t good and it’s dangerous for people who use it, particularly on a long-term foundation.”
Whereas Perry and his fellow senators handed an an identical invoice within the first particular session, that invoice in the end did not make it to Abbott’s desk for consideration as a result of 57 Home Democrats broke quorum—or prevented the decrease chamber from conducting legislative enterprise—by leaving the state to protest a GOP redistricting plan.
Nonetheless, Texas Home Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu and his fellow liberals returned to the Capitol this week in Austin, permitting the Home to achieve a quorum on Monday to conduct its legislative enterprise for the second particular session. This implies hemp THC prohibition stays an actual menace to roughly 8,000 companies that present a $10.3 billion financial influence on the state, using some 50,000 employees, in response to Whitney Economics.
As soon as S.B. 6 passes the Senate on a procedural third studying, it’s going to formally arrive on the Home.
“Texas invoice S.B. 6 simply handed within the Senate to ban hemp with no public testimony allowed,” Texas-based Hometown Hero CEO Lukas Gilkey wrote on X. “We’re watching the Texas Senate flaunt their corruption to all Texans whereas utterly ignoring the need of their constituents. This is a humiliation to all Texans and ought to be a criminal offense.”
Below S.B. 6, the crime could be utilized to those that merely possess a consumable hemp product containing any quantity of a cannabinoid aside from CBD or CBG, which might be a Class C misdemeanor punishable by a $2,000 positive and a most of 180 days in jail.
Of their combat to cease the ban, business advocates level to a June 2025 ballot from the College of Texas/Texas Politics Venture that exposed 53% of doubtless Texas voters oppose a THC hemp product ban, whereas 31% help a ban.
And so they level to a March 2025 ballot carried out by Baselice & Associates Inc. confirmed that 68% of doubtless Texas voters supported regulating THC hemp merchandise versus 20% who supported a ban. That ballot additionally discovered that Republican voters help permitting THC to stay authorized (57%) at double the speed at which they need it banned (29%).
Sarcastically, an August 2025 ballot that was additionally carried out by Baselice & Associates Inc. confirmed very totally different outcomes: 62% of doubtless Texas Republican voters supported a ban, whereas 30% supported permitting THC merchandise to stay out there.
Gilkey accused Patrick of paying off the Austin-based analysis group within the latter ballot to offer the outcomes that backed the lieutenant governor’s agenda.
“Lieutenant Governor of Texas Danny P paid a pollster $755,000 to search out outcomes that he was pleased with as a result of he wasn’t pleased with their earlier ballot outcomes that confirmed most Texans need hemp to be authorized,” Gilkey stated Aug. 16. “So, what do they do? They put these extremely loaded questions that may not qualify for any type of ballot reliance in any way, they usually really use these questions to search out outcomes that Dan Patrick was pleased with. … He’s paid them $755,000 to search out outcomes that make him not appear to be an fool.”
One of many survey questions within the latter ballot requested respondents which viewpoint about THC comes closest to their very own:
- THC merchandise should be banned in Texas as a result of we have to shield youngsters and adults from harmful THC merchandise which are inflicting erratic conduct, extreme psychological and generally everlasting mind injury, and even demise.
- THC merchandise ought to stay out there on the market in Texas as a result of they provide Texans the liberty to get excessive for many individuals.
Whatever the discrepancies in Baselice polls, S.B. 6 seems inevitable for consideration within the Texas Home, the place lawmakers voted, 95-44, in Could, to cross an analogous model of the hemp THC ban within the common session.
Whereas it’s unclear if Abbott would veto S.B. 6 ought to it arrive at his desk, the timeline during which the Home doubtlessly passes the laws issues. If the invoice is offered to the governor fewer than 10 days (not counting Sunday) earlier than closing adjournment, then the Texas Legislature can’t train its two-thirds majority energy to override a veto.
In Texas, particular periods can final not than 30 days. This implies the Legislature would wish to ship Abbott S.B. 6 by Sept. 3—10 days earlier than the sine die adjournment date—to retain its energy to override a possible veto. The final time the Texas Legislature overrode a veto was 1979.
Particularly, Abbott clarified his place final month that cannabinoid hemp merchandise ought to solely be out there to these 21 years or older, consumable hemp merchandise containing artificial cannabinoids like delta-8 THC ought to be banned, and all different merchandise ought to be regulated and restricted to 0.3% THC or 3 milligrams of THC.
Ought to the Texas Legislature proceed to disregard his name for regulation, Abbott may go away the topic off his name record completely if a 3rd particular session involves order.
If nothing adjustments, then nothing adjustments—not less than in the case of a Texas GOP infight over whether or not to ban or regulate consumable hemp merchandise containing hint quantities of THC or different intoxicating cannabinoids.
Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and the Texas Senate performed Gov. Greg Abbott for a idiot but once more, because the higher chamber’s lawmakers voted, 22-8, on Aug. 18 to cross laws that disobeys the governor’s proclamation for a second particular session, during which he referred to as on the Legislature to regulate hemp merchandise quite than ban them.
Because the presiding officer of the Senate, Patrick championed comparable laws within the common session that Abbott vetoed in June as a result of he didn’t need to criminalize a “lawful agricultural commodity.” Nonetheless, Patrick and Senate Republicans stay steadfast of their prohibitive method, regardless of the Texas Structure barring state lawmakers from passing laws in a particular session that veers from the governor’s name.
The most recent laws, Senate Invoice 6, mirrors what the Senate handed within the first particular session: to ban the manufacture and sale of merchandise containing hemp-derived compounds aside from nonintoxicating CBD or CBG.
Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, sponsors the laws.
“It’s the identical invoice we handed out within the first particular session; nothing’s modified aside from the truth that increasingly data comes out each week concerning the influence and results of THC on the mind, the physique and long-term use,” Perry stated Monday night earlier than the ground vote on S.B. 6. Perry claimed polls help his place and drives the dialog towards “reliable science” that “these items just isn’t good and it’s dangerous for people who use it, particularly on a long-term foundation.”
Whereas Perry and his fellow senators handed an an identical invoice within the first particular session, that invoice in the end did not make it to Abbott’s desk for consideration as a result of 57 Home Democrats broke quorum—or prevented the decrease chamber from conducting legislative enterprise—by leaving the state to protest a GOP redistricting plan.
Nonetheless, Texas Home Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu and his fellow liberals returned to the Capitol this week in Austin, permitting the Home to achieve a quorum on Monday to conduct its legislative enterprise for the second particular session. This implies hemp THC prohibition stays an actual menace to roughly 8,000 companies that present a $10.3 billion financial influence on the state, using some 50,000 employees, in response to Whitney Economics.
As soon as S.B. 6 passes the Senate on a procedural third studying, it’s going to formally arrive on the Home.
“Texas invoice S.B. 6 simply handed within the Senate to ban hemp with no public testimony allowed,” Texas-based Hometown Hero CEO Lukas Gilkey wrote on X. “We’re watching the Texas Senate flaunt their corruption to all Texans whereas utterly ignoring the need of their constituents. This is a humiliation to all Texans and ought to be a criminal offense.”
Below S.B. 6, the crime could be utilized to those that merely possess a consumable hemp product containing any quantity of a cannabinoid aside from CBD or CBG, which might be a Class C misdemeanor punishable by a $2,000 positive and a most of 180 days in jail.
Of their combat to cease the ban, business advocates level to a June 2025 ballot from the College of Texas/Texas Politics Venture that exposed 53% of doubtless Texas voters oppose a THC hemp product ban, whereas 31% help a ban.
And so they level to a March 2025 ballot carried out by Baselice & Associates Inc. confirmed that 68% of doubtless Texas voters supported regulating THC hemp merchandise versus 20% who supported a ban. That ballot additionally discovered that Republican voters help permitting THC to stay authorized (57%) at double the speed at which they need it banned (29%).
Sarcastically, an August 2025 ballot that was additionally carried out by Baselice & Associates Inc. confirmed very totally different outcomes: 62% of doubtless Texas Republican voters supported a ban, whereas 30% supported permitting THC merchandise to stay out there.
Gilkey accused Patrick of paying off the Austin-based analysis group within the latter ballot to offer the outcomes that backed the lieutenant governor’s agenda.
“Lieutenant Governor of Texas Danny P paid a pollster $755,000 to search out outcomes that he was pleased with as a result of he wasn’t pleased with their earlier ballot outcomes that confirmed most Texans need hemp to be authorized,” Gilkey stated Aug. 16. “So, what do they do? They put these extremely loaded questions that may not qualify for any type of ballot reliance in any way, they usually really use these questions to search out outcomes that Dan Patrick was pleased with. … He’s paid them $755,000 to search out outcomes that make him not appear to be an fool.”
One of many survey questions within the latter ballot requested respondents which viewpoint about THC comes closest to their very own:
- THC merchandise should be banned in Texas as a result of we have to shield youngsters and adults from harmful THC merchandise which are inflicting erratic conduct, extreme psychological and generally everlasting mind injury, and even demise.
- THC merchandise ought to stay out there on the market in Texas as a result of they provide Texans the liberty to get excessive for many individuals.
Whatever the discrepancies in Baselice polls, S.B. 6 seems inevitable for consideration within the Texas Home, the place lawmakers voted, 95-44, in Could, to cross an analogous model of the hemp THC ban within the common session.
Whereas it’s unclear if Abbott would veto S.B. 6 ought to it arrive at his desk, the timeline during which the Home doubtlessly passes the laws issues. If the invoice is offered to the governor fewer than 10 days (not counting Sunday) earlier than closing adjournment, then the Texas Legislature can’t train its two-thirds majority energy to override a veto.
In Texas, particular periods can final not than 30 days. This implies the Legislature would wish to ship Abbott S.B. 6 by Sept. 3—10 days earlier than the sine die adjournment date—to retain its energy to override a possible veto. The final time the Texas Legislature overrode a veto was 1979.
Particularly, Abbott clarified his place final month that cannabinoid hemp merchandise ought to solely be out there to these 21 years or older, consumable hemp merchandise containing artificial cannabinoids like delta-8 THC ought to be banned, and all different merchandise ought to be regulated and restricted to 0.3% THC or 3 milligrams of THC.
Ought to the Texas Legislature proceed to disregard his name for regulation, Abbott may go away the topic off his name record completely if a 3rd particular session involves order.
Hashish Regulation Sources in Poland
Discover important authorized pages about hashish cultivation, gross sales, and medical product rules in Poland. These assets will information you thru permissions, certifications, and compliance necessities.
-
Polish News Registration and Interests of Cannabis Businesses
-
Permissions for Cannabis Sales in Poland
-
Authorization for Importing or Manufacturing Medical Products
-
Permission for Manufacturing or Importing Medical Products
-
Certificate of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)
-
Registration of Medical Products in Poland